Why it costs this little
You already have an AI subscription, and it already writes a passable nonconformity
statement. Pricing above that would be asking you to pay a premium for something you believe
you already have. So we don't.
What you are paying for is not the writing. It is that every sentence resolves — to
the clause text and to the specific client document it rests on — and that the evidence you
collect this year is still filed against a clause next year, when the same client comes up for
surveillance. A chat window can do neither, and no amount of prompting will change that.
Most of what £495 buys is not software at all. It is the week we spend taking your sections,
your question sequence and your scoring and building them into the platform — work we would
otherwise charge £750 to £1,500 for. We are doing it free for five practices because we need
five real methodologies running against real clients more than we need the money, and we would
rather say that plainly than dress it up as a launch promotion.
There is no per-standard charge and no cap on how many clients you keep in here. Building the
clause library costs us once, and a client record costs us nothing — charging for either would
be a toll rather than a cost. The only thing that scales with what we spend is report drafting,
so that is the only thing we meter.
Security
Organisation-scoped isolation enforced at the query layer rather than in application code.
US and EU data residency selectable per tenant. Dedicated environment with your own SSO
available on the Firm plan. Encryption at rest and in transit, MFA on every plan, and an
immutable append-only audit log.
No customer data is used for training, ever. We are targeting SOC 2 Type II
within twelve months of launch — and we would rather you interrogate this than take it on
faith, given what you do for a living.
AI governance
Every generated sentence carries a citation resolving to the response, artefact and clause it
came from. Output without a resolvable citation is rejected before it reaches a user. Clause
text is served from the standards library rather than model memory, so a clause reference
cannot be fabricated.
Nothing reaches a client without a named human accepting it, and that acceptance is recorded
with the model, the prompt template and the citation set. Any tenant can disable AI features
entirely and use the platform as a structured assessment tool.
A two-page AI governance statement is available on request. If you
sell ISO/IEC 42001 readiness, you will want to read it.